Loom Link: `https://www.loom.com/share/0a63d01d149d4266b82c5dd85c94c764` # truedrug ***truedrug**** is a prototype that estimates the probability an FDA drug application will be approved during its first review cycle.* *It focuses on once-weekly injectable GLP-1–based treatments for type 2 diabetes.* ## What it does The system turns pre-action public FDA evidence into a blinded dossier, then runs independent reviews across three disciplines: - CMC — chemistry, manufacturing, and controls - Pharm/tox — pharmacology and toxicology - Clinical — clinical evidence and safety Those reviewers produce structured, evidence-grounded findings. Deterministic code—not an LLM—then combines findings with a cited base rate and versioned likelihood-ratio table to calculate an approval probability and assemble a draft Complete Response Letter (CRL). ```text Public evidence → blinded dossier → CMC / pharm-tox / clinical reviews → validated findings → deterministic probability + draft CRL → frontend demo + evaluation report ``` ## Why blinding matters Models may already know drug outcomes. To avoid outcome leakage, the system removes drug, sponsor, trial-program, site, registry, application, and identifying URL information before review. The harness never receives outcome labels or blinding maps. ## Project structure - `docs/domain/` — shared contracts, checklists, regulatory context, and leakage rules - `specs/001-data-collection/` — evidence and dossier preparation - `specs/002-frontend/` — planned demo interface - `specs/003-harness/` — reviewer orchestration and prediction pipeline - `specs/004-evals/` — offline evaluation and leak-probe scaffold - `harness/` — harness implementation work - `evals/` — synthetic evaluation fixtures and checks - `splash/` — visual design material ## Local setup ```sh npm ci --ignore-scripts npm run trueforge ``` Open TrueForge at `http://localhost:8790`. TrueForge is the local agent configuration environment. The polished truedrug frontend is planned separately and is not currently served by this repository. ## Principles - Reviewers use only dossier evidence and their assigned checklist. - Each checklist item receives exactly one finding. - Findings must be grounded in dossier evidence. - Model output is validated and may be repaired once; invalid output fails rather than being fabricated. - Approval probability is computed in code. - Held-out evaluation cases are never used to tune prompts or rules. - Evaluation claims include a leak-probe result and are demonstrations, not statistical proof. ## Team **FirstCycle** A project about making first-cycle FDA review reasoning clearer, more traceable, and easier to evaluate.
Built at The Agent Harness Hackathon
TrueDrug
Loom Link: `https://www.loom.com/share/0a63d01d149d4266b82c5dd85c94c764` # truedrug ***truedrug**** is a prototype that estimates the probability an FDA drug application will be approved during its first review cycle.* *It focuses on once-weekly injectable GLP-1–based treatments for type 2 diabetes.* ## What it does The system turns pre-action public FDA evidence into a blinded dossier, then runs independent reviews across three disciplines: - CMC — chemistry, manufacturing, and controls - Pharm/tox — pharmacology and toxicology - Clinical — clinical evidence and safety Those reviewers produce structured, evidence-grounded findings. Deterministic code—not an LLM—then combines findings with a cited base rate and versioned likelihood-ratio table to calculate an approval probability and assemble a draft Complete Response Letter (CRL). ```text Public evidence → blinded dossier → CMC / pharm-tox / clinical reviews → validated findings → deterministic probability + draft CRL → frontend demo + evaluation report ``` ## Why blinding matters Models may already know drug outcomes. To avoid outcome leakage, the system removes drug, sponsor, trial-program, site, registry, application, and identifying URL information before review. The harness never receives outcome labels or blinding maps. ## Project structure - `docs/domain/` — shared contracts, checklists, regulatory context, and leakage rules - `specs/001-data-collection/` — evidence and dossier preparation - `specs/002-frontend/` — planned demo interface - `specs/003-harness/` — reviewer orchestration and prediction pipeline - `specs/004-evals/` — offline evaluation and leak-probe scaffold - `harness/` — harness implementation work - `evals/` — synthetic evaluation fixtures and checks - `splash/` — visual design material ## Local setup ```sh npm ci --ignore-scripts npm run trueforge ``` Open TrueForge at `http://localhost:8790`. TrueForge is the local agent configuration environment. The polished truedrug frontend is planned separately and is not currently served by this repository. ## Principles - Reviewers use only dossier evidence and their assigned checklist. - Each checklist item receives exactly one finding. - Findings must be grounded in dossier evidence. - Model output is validated and may be repaired once; invalid output fails rather than being fabricated. - Approval probability is computed in code. - Held-out evaluation cases are never used to tune prompts or rules. - Evaluation claims include a leak-probe result and are demonstrations, not statistical proof. ## Team **FirstCycle** A project about making first-cycle FDA review reasoning clearer, more traceable, and easier to evaluate.
Keep exploring what builders shipped.
Sports Whisperer
SportsWhisperer
With AI becoming centre stage - Content and Entertainment will be the king. Sport has the highest amount of spend as industry and creates massive economic drive, so we have built an All in One - Sports Whisperer for all major sports Crickets, NFL, Soccer, Basketball, Baseball, etc where the novice and experienced players can interact with the favorite games and players !!! More details captured - https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_q0SDTvutQP9kd2SLdDXYYkc-h9QVYwj0vdih1Cuqzc/edit?slide=id.gcb9a0b074_1_0#slide=id.gcb9a0b074_1_0
AgentInvariant
AgentInvariant
AgentInvariant is a behavioral safety evaluator for tool-using AI agents. Agent workflows are probabilistic: two requests with the same meaning can produce materially different external actions. AgentInvariant uses metamorphic testing to determine whether critical operational behavior remains consistent across meaning-equivalent inputs. For each input variant, AgentInvariant starts a fresh OpenAI conversation and an isolated SQLite database. The target agent uses real tools to check coverage, retrieve authorization requirements, record business approval, and submit a synthetic prior-authorization request. AgentInvariant records the complete structured tool trace and evaluates it using deterministic Python invariants—not an LLM judge. It verifies that exactly one submission occurs and that matching coverage and business approval are successfully recorded before submission. The evaluator is exposed through a Streamable HTTP MCP server and invoked by a TrueForge agent using the `evaluate_agent` tool. Results include per-variant PASS or BLOCKED decisions, ordered traces, exact invariant violations, compliance rate, and the shortest failing counterexample. The demo compares an explicitly labeled unsafe negative control, which AgentInvariant correctly blocks, with a hardened candidate that follows the required workflow. All healthcare data is synthetic. This project is an administrative workflow reliability demonstration and is not clinical decision support.
HackerSquad project
Robo Harness
Hardess for robo
